&w=1200&resize=1200,675&ssl=1)
Achi news desk-
New Delhi: God takes care of everything from above, be it good or bad, good or bad, but among others, a person has made news by making God himself a party in a land dispute.
A man had made Lord Hanuman his co-litigant in a land dispute involving a temple built on his land. An investigation into this was underway in court.
The Delhi High Court awarded Rs 1 lakh to this person in connection with the acquisition of the private land that currently houses the temple. A penalty was imposed. Rejecting the plea of 31-year-old Ankit Mishra, the court ordered him to pay a fine of ₹ 1 lakh to the owner of the property, Suraj Malik.
Speaking about the case and the verdict, Justice C Harishankar said, “I never thought that one day God would become a litigant before me. But, fortunately, it appears to be a case of divinity by proxy,” he said in the 51-page judgment handed down on Monday.
Also read: Rain Warning: Cyclone Impact, 50KM Winds, Storms and Thunderstorms in Next 24 Hours!
What is the cause?
31-year-old Ankit Mishra had filed an application in court challenging the lower court’s verdict confirming that the temple is located on private land owned by Sooraj Malik. But the court rejected this petition.
As there is a public temple in the property dedicated to Lord Hanuman, the land belongs to Lord Hanuman and this land has become a public temple. Because of this, Malik’s ownership rights should be canceled due to public worship there.
I want as a friend to protect the benefit of Lord Hanuman. Hanuman does not know much about law. He said I was doing this on his behalf.
What did the court say?
Only the court, which reviewed the petition, said that allowing occasional public access to the temple would not change its former private nature. The Delhi High Court upheld the lower court’s judgment that the mere presence of a temple there does not impair the rights of the landowner.
Justice Shankar Mishra pointed out the dire implications of the petition. Justice C. called it a “class agreement” with the intention of grabbing property. Harishankar rejected the appeal filed by Ankit Mishra.
He stressed that public worship in a privately owned temple does not turn it into a public temple, warning that such misinterpretation could lead to legal and social consequences. Even if the public has free access, the fact that the public worships in a private temple does not mean that the temple is a public temple.
“The land on which a private temple is built does not belong to God, it is only for the purpose that the temple is built by the public and dedicated to the God who has incorporated into it and the temple is opened to the public, it cannot be manipulated. as a public temple,” the court said.
Also Read: Population: India’s Hindu population has dropped by 8%! Tremendous increase in the Muslim population! Study report disclosed
Mishra has acted in “negligent agreement” with the current owner of the land. As happened in the present case, a person can usurp someone else’s property, build a temple on the property.
From time to time, the public may be permitted to worship and may obstruct the permanent restoration of the property to its owner. The Court warned that these incentives cannot be encouraged.
Read the latest news first at News 18 Kannada. Get daily fresh news, live news update on Believer News 18 in Kannada
&w=1200&resize=1200,0&ssl=1&description=The+court+imposed+a+fine+of+%E2%82%B9+1+lakh+on+a+person+who+made+God+himself+a+party+in+a+property+dispute+case%0A%0A+Achi-News){kind=link}