Achi news desk-
A bill introduced in the US Congress on Tuesday aims to force artificial intelligence companies to disclose the copyrighted material they use to make their productive AI models. The legislation adds to a growing number of efforts by lawmakers, news outlets and artists to establish how AI companies use creative works such as songs, visual art, books and films to train their software – and whether those companies illegally build their tools off of copyrighted content.
California Democratic congressman Adam Schiff introduced the bill, the Generative AI Copyright Disclosure Act, which would require AI companies to submit any copyrighted works in their training datasets to the Copyright Register before releasing new generative AI systems, which create text, images, music. or video in response to user suggestions. The bill would require companies to file such documents at least 30 days before publicly announcing their AI tools, or face a financial penalty. Such datasets cover billions of lines of text and images or millions of hours of music and movies.
“AI has the disruptive potential to change our economy, our political system, and our day-to-day lives. We must balance the tremendous potential of AI with the critical need for ethical guidelines and safeguards,” Schiff said in a statement.
Whether large multibillion-dollar artificial intelligence companies have made illegal use of copyrighted works is increasingly a source of litigation and government investigation. Schiff’s bill wouldn’t ban AI from training on copyrighted material, but it would put significant pressure on companies to list the huge range of works they use to build tools like ChatGPT — data that’s usually kept private.
Schiff’s bill, first reported by Billboard, has received the support of several organizations and unions in the entertainment industry, including the Recording Industry Association of America, Professional Photographers of America, the Directors Guild of America and the Television and Television Federation of American Screen Actors Guild. Radio Artists.
“Ultimately, everything produced by AI originates from a human creative source. That’s why human creative content – intellectual property – must be protected,” said Duncan Crabtree-Ireland, SAG-AFTRA’s national executive director and chief negotiator.
Prominent artificial intelligence companies like OpenAI are facing lawsuits over their alleged use of copyrighted work to build tools like ChatGPT. Sarah Silverman and the New York Times have filed copyright infringement claims against the startup. OpenAI has hired a slew of top lawyers in the past year, according to the Washington Post, as it prepares to face over a dozen major lawsuits.
OpenAI and other artificial intelligence companies have denied wrongdoing and have claimed that their use of copyrighted material falls under fair use, a legal doctrine that allows for some unlicensed use of copyrighted material under certain conditions. The legal strategy is a major test for copyright law, and the outcome could destroy artists’ livelihoods or OpenAI’s bottom line. In a submission to a UK government committee earlier this year, OpenAI’s lawyers argued that “legally, copyright law does not prohibit training.” OpenAI also said in that presentation that without access to copyrighted works, its tools would cease to function.
As productive AI companies expand the capabilities of their tools, entertainment industry workers have also pushed back against the technology and its potential threat to artists’ rights. Last week, a group of over 200 high-profile musical artists released an open letter calling for more protections against AI and demanding that companies not develop tools that could undermine or replace musicians and songwriters.
Ad blocking test (Why?)
Source link
Related
